Members of Washington’s trucking industry are raising concerns over the state’s alignment with California’s strict emission regulations, warning that the policies could negatively impact long-haul trucking in the region.
During a recent hearing before the Senate Environment, Energy & Technology Committee, industry leaders and lawmakers debated Senate Bill 5091 (SB 5091)—a Republican-led proposal that seeks to sever Washington’s automatic adoption of California’s emission standards in favor of federal guidelines.
Concerns Over Emission Mandates
For nearly two decades, Washington has voluntarily followed California’s aggressive environmental policies, which include stringent pollution controls and a gradual shift toward electric and zero-emission vehicles. However, trucking advocates argue that the transition is costly and impractical for long-haul operations.
“The trucking industry needs time to navigate these challenges,” said Sen. Matt Boehnke, R-Kennewick, the bill’s sponsor. Supporters of SB 5091 say the legislation would protect truckers from what they describe as burdensome mandates that could disrupt the industry.
Also Read
Several industry representatives voiced similar concerns, including Jerry Vanderwood of the Associated General Contractors, who warned that the regulations could significantly impact construction costs. Sheri Call, CEO of Washington Trucking Associations, emphasized that the state must fully separate from California’s regulations to make necessary adjustments to its policies.
Impact on Trucking Businesses
Industry leaders also highlighted the struggles of trucking manufacturers. Sean Waters, Vice President of Product Integrity at Daimler Trucks, noted that sales of electric long-haul trucks remain extremely low due to limited range and lengthy charging times.
“In the Class-8 Tractor market, where we hold 40% market share, we’ve sold just three electric trucks in the past three years,” Waters testified. Current regulations require companies to sell a certain percentage of electric trucks before they can sell diesel models, making it difficult for businesses to operate efficiently.
Also Read – California Reports More Than 900 Flu Deaths—Health Officials Concerned
The issue of long-haul truck performance was also raised. Rep. Paul Harris, R-Vancouver, asked about the capabilities of electric freight trucks, including range, charging times, and load capacity. Waters responded that current electric trucks can only travel 150 to 250 miles per charge, with recharging taking anywhere from five to six hours, making them impractical for many trucking routes.
Economic and Tax Implications
The economic impact of the policy was another key point of debate. Corey Daniels, General Sales Manager at Pape’ Kenworth in SeaTac, cautioned lawmakers about the potential tax revenue loss Washington could face if truck buyers take their business elsewhere.
“Washington’s seven major truck manufacturers generate around $100 million in tax revenue annually,” Daniels explained. “If these policies drive buyers to Idaho or other states, that revenue could disappear.”
Similarly, Steve Gordon of Gordon Trucking noted that trucking is an interstate business, meaning Washington-based operators can simply purchase vehicles in states with less restrictive regulations, creating a competitive disadvantage for local businesses.
Opposition to SB 5091
Not all voices at the hearing were in favor of the bill. Environmental advocates and some lawmakers argued that maintaining Washington’s alignment with California’s standards is critical for reducing pollution and expanding clean energy jobs.
Mathew Hepner of the Certified Electrical Workers of Washington pointed out that transitioning to electric trucks would create new opportunities for skilled workers while cutting harmful emissions. Margaret Boelter of Zeem Solutions added that electric vehicle infrastructure is expanding, with a major charging hub set to open in SeaTac by the end of the year, capable of servicing hundreds of heavy-duty vehicles daily.
Despite the heated debate, no vote was taken at the conclusion of the hearing. With the deadline for bills to pass out of committee expiring, the future of SB 5091 remains uncertain.
- Hit-and-Run Driver Sought After 4-Year-Old Boy Killed in Los Angeles - April 22, 2025
- Police Pursuit of 2 Priuses Ends with Driver Escaping Into Harbor - April 22, 2025
- Suspect Arrested After Allegedly Shooting at LAPD Helicopter - April 22, 2025
