Last month, Congress took rare bipartisan action to address long-standing Social Security rules that impact millions of Americans.
On November 12, the House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed the Social Security Fairness Act by a 327 to 75 majority. The proposed legislation seeks to eliminate two controversial rules—the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO)—that reduce Social Security benefits for approximately 2.8 million Americans who also receive income from public pensions.
For advocates of the bill, the House vote was a significant victory. However, they now face a tense waiting period as the Senate considers the proposal. The clock is ticking, with only a few legislative days remaining in the current Congressional session.
Senate Action on the Horizon
At a rally on Capitol Hill last Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) promised to bring the bill to a vote, addressing an audience of teachers, firefighters, police officers, and other public employees gathered in the rain.
“I am here to tell you the Senate is going to take action,” Schumer said, to cheers from the crowd. “I’ve got all my Democrats lined up to support it. We just need 15 Republicans.”
Schumer criticized the current rules, calling them “unfair” and “un-American.”
Advocates like Bette Marafino, an 86-year-old retired teacher, are optimistic yet worried. Having celebrated the House vote, Marafino is concerned about the consequences if the Senate fails to act before the December 20 deadline. “It’s going to be start all over again,” she said, emphasizing the need for continued advocacy.
The Debate Over WEP and GPO
The Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset were implemented to ensure that Social Security benefits remain progressive, providing higher income replacement rates for lower-income workers. Critics of the rules argue they unfairly penalize public employees, including teachers, firefighters, and police officers, who often rely on multiple sources of retirement income.
Supporters of the Social Security Fairness Act, such as the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), believe eliminating these rules is the only equitable solution. IAFF General President Edward Kelly explained how these rules disproportionately harm public workers:
- Public employees paying into Social Security through second or third jobs often see their benefits reduced by $500 to $600 per month.
- For some, this reduction is devastating, forcing them to delay retirement or live with significantly lower income in retirement.
However, critics of the bill point out its high cost. The Congressional Budget Office estimates it would add $196 billion to federal deficits over the next decade.
Some experts suggest revising the WEP and GPO formulas to adjust benefits more precisely rather than eliminating the rules entirely. Emerson Sprick of the Bipartisan Policy Center noted that such reforms could address inequities without compromising Social Security’s financial health.
Personal Stories Highlight the Impact
The reduction in Social Security benefits often catches public workers by surprise.
Roger Boudreau, a 75-year-old former teacher, learned only upon signing up for Social Security benefits that his payments would be cut by 40% due to WEP. Over the past decade, he estimates losing $5,000 annually because of the policy.
Lois Carson, a 64-year-old Columbus City Schools employee and president of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees, has delayed her retirement due to the limits GPO places on survivor benefits. “Most women work longer because they can draw their husband’s Social Security while working,” she said. “But once they retire, it drops down to a third.”
Advocacy Efforts Continue
Advocacy groups like the IAFF have worked tirelessly to push the legislation forward. Since the House vote, the IAFF alone has sent approximately 29,000 emails urging Senate leaders to pass the bill.
Despite strong bipartisan support—62 Senate co-sponsors—the bill faces competition from other legislative priorities. If it does not pass in this session, the initiative will have to be reintroduced in the next Congress.
“If it gets to a final vote under standard Senate procedure, I don’t see a whole lot of opportunity for it to fail,” Sprick said. “The question is whether it gets to that final vote.”
The stakes are high for millions of public workers and retirees who are eager to see this long-standing issue addressed.
- Prison Officer Survives Attack by Inmate Transferred from L.A. County - March 19, 2025
- Family and Friends Search for Missing Los Angeles County Woman - March 19, 2025
- Manhunt for 4 Suspects Wanted in Violent Culver City Robbery - March 19, 2025
